Effects of Eutrophication on Ranunculus and Potamogeton

Andrew J. Spink, K.J. Murphy, S.M. Smith and D.F. Westlake

Published in: Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 31, 113-117.


Abstract
Methods
Results & Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
Tables and Figure Captions



ABSTRACT
 
Water Crowfoot (Ranunculus penicillatus subsp. pseudofluitans (Syme) S.Webster) plants were grown in two artificial recirculating rivers, in one of which the phosphate concentration of the input was raised from 40 µgPl-1 to 200 µgPl-1. Fennel Pondweed (Potamgeton pectinatus L.) plants were planted as a competitor in association with 50% of the Ranunculus clumps. Chemical concentrations of the major elements in the water were measured weekly. Filamentous algae grew in profusion in the channel with added phosphate (0.77 T fresh weight), compared with an immeasurably low amount in the control channel. After 100 days the plants were removed, dried and weighed and the tissue concentrations of the major elements were measured. The Ranunculus shoots grew less in the eutrophic channel, and its roots grew less in the presence of Potamgeton. The Potamgeton showed a greater reduction in shoot and root biomass than the Ranunculus. Tissue phosphate concentrations were higher in both species in the eutrophic channel. The data suggested that P. pectinatus is a more competitive species (sensu Grime) than R. penicillatus.



INTRODUCTION

River plants tend to be associated with particular nutrient concentrations (Holmes and Newbold 1984).  In streams where there is an inflow of polluted water (for example, sewage effluent), species such as Ranunculus fluitans L. and R. penicillatus are often replaced by Potamgeton pectinatus (Butcher 1933, Harding 1979, 1980).  Although the pollution is sometimes intense enough to destroy the Ranunculus outright (Hawkes 1978), often it appears that the change in vegetation is due to a change in the competitive balance between the plant species present.  However, there is a paucity of experimental data to back up conclusions which have mostly been drawn from field observations.  The aim of the experiment described here was to investigate the effects of pollution by increased phosphate concentration on R. penicillatus  subsp. pseudofluitans and Potamgeton pectinatus.



METHODS

The experiment was carried out in two artificial recirculating rivers at the Waterston Experimental Station of the Institute of Freshwater Ecology.  Each artificial river consists of a 53 m long race-track shaped fibre(c)glass channel, incorporating an Archimedes screw pump to circulate the water.  The water velocity was, on average, 0.25 m s-1 , with no significant difference  between the two channels.  The channels were both filled with water to a depth of 0.4 m above the gravel substratum.  They have a trapezoid cross-section, and the base was filled with gravel to a depth of 0.4 meters.  The channels were continuously topped-up with groundwater from a borehole.  The input was adjusted to ensure that the volume of water in each channel was 0.50 m when the gravel is installed (Fox, 1987).  Bullhead fish (Cottus gobio L.) were electro-fished from a nearby stream and placed in the channels (equal numbers in each) to prevent large fluctuations
in populations of invertebrate grazers.

The water supply has a constant chemical composition which is similar to the source of many chalk streams (Marker and Casey 1982, Casey and Newton 1973, Westlake et al. 1972).  It contained adequate concentrations of all the ions necessary for plant growth, with the exception of iron (Marker and Casey 1982), so  FeCl was added (together with EDTA) at a concentration equivalent to 1 mg l-1 in the borehole water.

In one channel (the control) no other additional chemicals were added.  In the other, phosphate was added as phosphoric acid.  The input PO-P concentration was increased from 40 to 200 ug/l (see Figure 1).  Concentrations of  200 - 750 ug/l have been measured in southern English chalk streams such as the River Itchen which has abundant R. penicillatus
subsp. pseudofluitans (Spink 1992).  The phosphate was continuously added by a peristaltic pump from a 60 l vat.  The major chemical elements in the water were analysed weekly (Figure 1).  Soluble phosphate and nitrate was measured using flow injection analysis (Ruzicka and Hansen 1981), potassium using atomic absorbtion spectrophotometry (American Public Health Association 1980) and sulphate was measured using an ion(c)exchange procedure (MacKereth 1955).

On 31 March 1990 R. penicillatus subsp. pseudofluitans Potamgeton pectinatus plants were planted in the two channels.  Ten groups of five pots were planted with five Ranunculus plants in each pot and an additional four
Potamgeton plants in 50% of the pots. The fresh weight of all the plants was measured before planting out to ensure that
there was no initial difference between treatments.  Before planting, water was pumped for several hours between the two channels (in both directions, consecutively) to ensure that the initial algal populations were similar for both channels.

On 12 July 1990 (after 100 days) the plants were removed from the channels,  dried (95 degreees C), separated into roots and shoots, weighed, and the tissue concentrations of phosphorus, nitrogen, carbon and potassium were measured.  An estimate was also made of the weight of fillamentous algae (Cladophora glomerata (L.) Kutz) in the channels.

A rigid polypropylene container (approximately 20 l) was carefully placed in the channel and allowed to fill with water plus algae.  The container was removed from the channel, the volume of water was determined and the weight of algae used to estimate the total weight in the total volume of the channel (nine replicates).



RESULTS and DISCUSSION

The control channel had an immeasurably low amount of algae growing in it, whereas the channel with added phosphate had an estimated 770 kg fresh weight (23 kg dry weight) of fillamentous algae (Cladophora glomerata).  The channel with added phosphate had less Ranunculus shoot biomass, the root to shoot ratio was increased and there was a greater concentration of major nutrients in the shoots.  There was no effect on the root biomass, but this was decreased in the pots with Potamgeton pectinatus present.  The Potamgeton pectinatus root and shoot biomass was reduced in the channel with added phosphate (though the ratio remained unaltered) and there were reduced levels of other major nutrients (see Table 1 and Figure 2).

The addition of phosphate to one channel had a major effect on filamentous algal growth in that channel.  A likely result of this greatly enhanced filamentous algal biomass would be to substantially reduce the quantity of light available for submerged macrophyte photosynthesis, and so would be a significant cause of stress (Turner et al. 1991, Marrs et al. 1992).

The ten pots in each channel were not true replicates but "pseudoreplicates" as they were not statistically independent (Hurlbert 1984).  As only two channels were available for this experiment it was not possible to fully replicate the treatment.  The statistical comparisons are therefore comparisons between the two channels rather than between
the two treatments.  The question therefore arises as to whether it is a reasonable assumption that the differences observed between the channels were due to the phosphate treatment or due to another factor.  The major measured differences between the channels were the relatively high phosphate concentration (Figure 1) and large algal
growth in the channel with the added phosphate; both were clearly directly caused by the treatment.  Conversely, the concentrations of many of the other chemical elements  rose and fell in concert in each channel during the growing season (Figure 1; details in Spink 1992).  This indicates that it is likely that external factors acting on the channels had
similar effects on each channel.  However, although it is likely that the effects on the plants observed were due to the treatment, the possibility that it was due to another factor can not be excluded.
 
The data indicate that in the channel with the increased phosphate the Ranunculus responded with a reduction in shoot growth (but no change in the root growth).

Conversely, the competition from the Potamgeton  did not cause any reduction in shoot biomass, but it did cause a significant reduction in root growth.  The reduced growth in both Ranunculus and Potamogeton pectinatus  was most likely to have been caused by shading which resulted resulted from increased filamentous algal growth.  This effect is
consistent with the hypothesis proposed by Phillips et al. (1978) to explain the disappearance of aquatic macrophytes from the Norfolk Broads.

The tissue phosphate concentrations of both the Ranunculus and the Potamgeton pectinatus were increased in the high phosphate channel.  As the sediment concentrations of nitrogen and potassium were identical in both channels these data indicate that the concentration of these elements in the water is a significant factor, demonstrating that, for both Potamgeton pectinatus and R. penicillatus subsp. pseudofluitans , shoots as well as roots are an important pathway for nutrient (N, P and K) uptake.

A number of characteristics of the biology of Potamgeton pectinatus suggest that some ecotypes of this species show a strongly competitive strategy (Grime 1979). P. pectinatus is frequently found in very productive eutrophic habitats and can form an extensive dense canopy (Van Wijk 1988).  It shows little physiological acclimation to changes in light intensity, responding instead with changes in biomass (Hootsmans and Vermaat 1991).  The species shows a strong seasonal variation in phenology and photosynthesis (Van Wijk 1988).  From these characteristics it might be expected that Potamgeton pectinatus would be a more competitive (and so less stress-tolerant) plant than Ranunculus penicillatus - the data from this experiment go some way towards confirming that.  A competitive plant responds to stress with relatively large changes in growth rate (Grime 1977, 1979), whereas a more stress-tolerant plant will show a smaller change.  The Potamgeton  shoot biomass was seven times smaller in the added phosphate ("stress") treatment, whereas the Ranunculus shoot was only 4.4 times smaller (Figure 2).  In addition there was a significant biomass reduction in both the shoot and root of the Potamgeton, whereas there was only a significant reduction in the shoot of
Ranunculus.

In several English chalk streams dominated by R. penicillatus subsp. pseudofluitans, the water phosphate concentrations have increased over the past few decades.  For example,  the River Itchen at Winchester has shown a three-fold increase in phosphate concentration during the period 1979 - 1989 (National Rivers Authority, unpublished data).  The results from this experiment indicate that, if the concentration of phosphate continues to increase, it is likely that there may be a decline in macrophytes and an increase in filamentous algae.

In the recirculating channels the algae could not get washed away downstream and so this may have led to more algal accumulation than would occur naturally in a fast-flowing river, though algal populations apparently as dense as those in this experiment have been observed in some chalk rivers (Spink 1992).  In situations where algae may not grow so abundantly it would be useful to predict what changes might occur in the balance between the species making up the macrophyte community.  Data from this experiment support the hypothesis that Potamogeton pectinatus is a more competitive taxon than R. penicillatus subsp. pseudofluitans (it showed larger mrophological changes
when stressed).  So it is likely that if there was a situation of increased nutrient supply without the stress caused by competition from filamentous algae, the Potamgeton would forage nutrients more efficiently than the Ranunculus, show a greater plasticity in its growth response, and so out-compete the Ranunculus.  Indeed, there is evidence (Caffrey
1990) to suggest that this has already happened in some organically polluted rivers in the British Isles.
 



ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This experiment was carried out whilst AJS was holding a U.K. N.E.R.C. studentship.
The authors would like to thank Brian Dear for his help in maintenance of the artificial rivers and Jean Lishman for assistance with plant chemical analysis.



LITERATURE CITED

American Public Health Association (1980).  Standard Methods for the Examination of water and wastewater, 15th Edition.
Butcher R.W. (1933)  Studies on the ecology of rivers I.  On the distribution of macrophyte vegetation in the rivers of Britain.  J. Ecol. 21: 58-91.
Caffrey J. (1990)  Problems relating to the management of Potamgeton pectinatus L. in Irish rivers.  Proceedings EWRS 8th Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, 1990, 61-68.
Casey H. and Newton P.V.R. (1973)  The chemical composition of the River Frome and its main tributaries.  Freshwat. Biol. 3: 317-333.
Fox A.M. (1987)  The efficacy and ecological impact of the management of submerged macrophyte vegetation in flowing water.  Ph.D. Theis, University of Glasgow.
Grime J.P. (1977)  Evidence for the existance of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory.  Am. Nat. 111: 1169-1194.
Grime J.P. (1979)  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes.  John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.  pp 222.
Harding J.P.C. (1979)  River Macrophytes of the Mersey and Ribble basins, Summer 1978.  North West Water Authority Rivers Division, Scientists Department Technical Support Group.  Ref TS-BS-79-1.
Harding J.P.C. (1980)  Macrophytes of the River Weaver.  North West Water Authority Rivers Division.  Scientists Department Technical Support Group.  Ref TS-BS-80-2.
Hawkes H.A. (1978)  River bed animals, tell-tales of pollution.  In:  Hughes G. and Hawkes H.A. (eds)  Biosurveillance of River Water Quality pp 55-77.  Proceedings of Section K of the BAAS, Aston 1977.
Holmes N.T.H. and Newbold C. (1984)  River plant communities - reflectors of water and substrate chemistry.  Focus on Nature Conservation No. 9, NCC, London.
Hootsmans M.J.M. and Vermaat J.E. (1991)  Macrophytes, a Key to Understanding Changes caused by Eutrophication in Shallow Freshwater Ecosystems.  Report Series 21.  IIHEE, Delft, The Netherlands.
Hurlbert S.H. (1984)  Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Mono. 54: 187-211
MacKereth F.J.H. (1955)  Ion(c)exchange procedures for the estimation of (i) total ionic concentrations (ii) chlorides and (iii) sulphates in natural waters. Mitt. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol. No. 4.  16pp
Marker A.F.H. and Casey H. (1982)  The population and production dynamics of benthic algae in an artificial recirculating hard-water stream.  Phil. Trans. Royal. Soc. B298: 265-308.
Marrs S.J., Murphy K.J. and Dominy P.J. (1992).  Relationships between submerged macrophytes and algae in freshwater lochs of differing trophic status.  Submitted to J. Aquat. Pl. Manage.
Phillips G.L., Eminson D. and Moss B. (1978)  A mechanism to account for macrophyte decline in progressively eutrophicated freshwaters.  Aquat. Bot. 4: 103-126.
Ruzicka J. & Hansen E.H. (1981)  Flow Injection Analysis J. Wiley & Sons, New York.
Spink A.J. (1992)  The Ecological Strategies of Aquatic Ranunculus  Species.  PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow.  pp 340.
Turner M.A., Howell E.T., Summerby M., Hesslein R.H., Findlay D.L. and Jackson M.B. (1991)  Changes in epilithon and epiphyton associated with experimental acidification of a lake to pH 5.  Limnol. Oceanogr. 36(7): 1390-1405.
Van Wijk R.J. (1988)  Ecological studies on Potamgeton pectinatus  L.  I.  General characteristics, biomass production and life cycles under field conditions.  Aquat. Bot. 31: 211-258
Westlake D.F., Casey H., Dawson F.H., Ladle M., Mann R.H. and Marker A.F.H. (1972). The chalk stream ecosystem.  Proc. IBP/UNESCO Symposium on Productivity Problems of Freshwaters, Kazimierz Dolny 1970. Eds Kajak Z. and Hillbright-Ilkowska A., pp 615-635.



TABLES
Table 1.  Summary of Analysis of Variance.

"Competition" indicates the effects of Potamgeton pectinatus plants on the Ranunculus plants, "Channel" indicates the difference between the control channel and the one with added phosphate.  Nutrient values refer to levels in shoot tissue.  If the value is indicated as an "increase" it is greater in the treatment than in the control.  Levels of significance
as follows:  n.s. = not significant, * = 95%, ** = 99%, *** = 99.9%.
 
 
 
Variate  Source Significance Direction
Ranunculus
Shoot dry weight Competition ns
Channel *** decrease
Interaction ns
Root dry weight Competition * decrease
Channel ns
Interaction ns
Nitrogen Competition ns
Channel *** Increase
Interaction ns
Phosphate Competition ns
Channel *** Increase
Interaction ns
Potassium Competition ns
Channel *** Increase
Interaction ns
Potamogeton
Shoot dry weight Channel ** Decrease
Root dry weight Channel * Decrease
Nitrogen Channel ** Increase
Phosphate Channel *** Increase
Potassium Channel * Increase
 

 

FIGURES

Figure 1

Chemical concentrations of soluble phosphate, nitrate, potassium and sulphate
in artificial rivers (clockwise from bottom left).  Control channel shown in solid line, channel with added phosphate
in dotted line.  Concentration of input shown by arrow on ordinate (not available for
sulphate).
 

Figure 2


Effect of channel with added phosphate (+P) and presence of Potamgeton pectinatus  (+P.pect) on Ranunculus penicillatus  subsp. pseudofluitans  growth (upper graph), and on P. pectinatus  growth (lower graph).  "Control" represents plants in channel without added phosphate, and growing without competition from P. pectinatus
.  Bars on histograms represent ug/l  1 standard error, separate bars represent least significant difference (LSD) (p ug/l
 0.05).



Go to top

Ranunculus home page